Večino odgovorov najdeš tukaj: JREF Challenge FAQ
Vsi, ki so se prijavili, niso uspeli dokazati niti drobtinice nadnaravnega. Vsi so bili šarlatani in razkrinkani. Pod kontroliranimi pogoji ni nikomur uspelo nič. Zame je to jasen dokaz, da so vse trditve, da ima nekdo nadnaravne sposobnosti, kratkomalo laž -- vede ali nevede.
In v ozadju ni nobene "zarote znanosti". Že sama predpostavka dokazuje, da nimaš pojma, kaj je znanstven pristop in kako deluje. Bistvo je, da so poskusi ponovljivi. Vsak jih lahko izvede pod enakimi pogoji in potrdi ali pa ovrže predhodnje poskuse. Ljudje se sami prijavljajo na izziv, Randi sicer res hodi ali je hodil okoli in razkrinkaval šarlatane. In do danes je razkrinkal vsakogar, ki se ga je lotil.
E Alanu sem si celo vzel čas in prebral zadevce...
mogoče ne bi bilo slabo če bi si še ti mal prebral detajle preden v različnih temah omenjaš Randija...preberi si kdaj to testiranje ne pride v poštev... In ker smo glih pri črni magiji...devilčki, eksorcist, entiteta, uroki....tole mi malo izstopa pri tem linku...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, a claim of exorcism must have prior proof of the existence of demons, unless the existence of demons would be self-evident during the exorcism. If someone’s head spins ‘round the wrong direction during an exorcism, it is safe to say that demons (or some other entities) are responsible. Projectile vomiting, however, is nasty and probably explainable....
2.4 Why do you reject claims that might cause injury?
Because the JREF doesn’t want anyone to get hurt or die, for both legal and humanitarian reasons. The JREF will not condone or support any claim where injury may occur. We don’t even want you to try it at home first.
For example, if you claim you can jump off a ten story building and survive, the JREF is not going to test you at it because people jumping off buildings doesn’t normally end well.
2.5 Why can’t I submit a religious or spiritual claim?
Because they are, for the most part, untestable. For example, you can look at a series of events – say surviving an automobile crash, surviving a plane crash, surviving a near-drowning and say “This was the hand of God,” but the point of the Challenge isn’t to give anecdotal evidence. It is to give something testable. Most religious people believe it’s impossible to test God. We’re pretty sure they’re right, though perhaps for different reasons.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zanimivo...če jaz prav sklepam je to glih kontra temu kar se kao pri črni magiji gre...če hoče prvi osebek ubiti drugega z urokom, vudu lutke, astralna potovanja...itd...
Moj zaključek je da Randy nima milijon dolarjev, je samo posrednik...denar je v določenem fondu v katerega so prispevali različni donatorji...denar je kao tax free...
Alan se je pa malo zapletel v svoje besede, ker se ni pozanimal o detajlih...kdaj testiranje NE pride v poštev...ni čudno da niso testirali skoraj nobenega budističnega meniha...
In še zmeraj čakam na definicijo besedice "magija" po Alanovo...
